🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where Black people are paid to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has developed since that time, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator gains confidence to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to remove African American heritage and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how minimally it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.